Tag: conflict resolution

I’m getting better at it

For my homework, I had to complete a ‘personal conflict style inventory’. You can do yours as well by clicking Adult Personal Conflict Style Inventory.

My preferred styles of managing conflict are:

 

Calm – Response when issues/conflicts first arise.

Storm – Response after the issues/conflicts have been unresolved and have grown in intensity.

1.

Collaborating

Accommodating

2.

Avoiding

Avoiding

3.

Accommodating

Compromising

4.

Comprimising

Collaborating or Forcing

My homework sheet asked, How accurate a description do you think this is for you?

I think the results are very accurate. I feel uncomfortable when people argue and will usually avoid conflicts. I feel very anxious whenever I know I have to have a difficult conversation with someone. In fact, I found conflict so upsetting, that I enrolled in this conflict resolution program to learn how to deal with it.

Mediation

I’ve spent most of the week at an intensive workshop in mediation. Mediation is often an alternative to going to court but the process is also used to handle non-legal disputes. My interest is in environmental disputes. In the past, I’ve sat in community consultations and felt helpless because I couldn’t understand why people were so angry, didn’t agree, weren’t listening.

I could go on about this but I’m tired and will now write whatever. So I’ve spent the week learning some general skills like active listening, asking the right questions, reframing. I’ve begun learning the theory of negotiation. My next subject is called ‘negotiation’ so I will study this aspect more in depth later.

Anyway, a lot of the week was spent in role plays. We played mediators, as well as disputing parties. Even though it’s all fake, it’s still very draining and emotional. I’ve had to mediate and act in disputes about inheritance, intellectual property, someone stealing an old lady’s car and crashing it, the dissolution of a medical partnership, a custody battle… The most interesting dispute for me was where the local church had set up a soup kitchen in an affluent neighbourhood and the community members wanted to close it down because it was attracting ‘criminals and bums’ to the neighbourhood. I found that this dispute was a lot like many environmental ones. It was about differences in values and the ‘not in my backyard’ syndrome. I played the NIMBY proponent. I think I did it well too. I channeled the anger I had seen at community meetings about new incinerators and toxic waste dumps.

I had no idea how good I would be at mediation until I actually did it on day two of the workshop. I was crap. We’ve learned a particular model of mediation (the facilitative model) and the framework has been really helpful to work in. But the pressure of thinking and listening at the same time! You have to be so careful to ask the right questions. You have to be impartial and to never show your biases or ideas or solutions. A mediator’s hands should not be seen to be all over the decision.

Why have I been so bad at it? Firstly, my lack of experience and skill. That’s to be expected. Today, though, in our final coaching session, I did really well. I was finally able to overcome my tentativeness. Yesterday, while writing my reflective journal (which is assessed by the lecturer), I decided to stop worrying if I was asking the right or wrong questions. I stopped worrying about being calm and still. I decided to ask the questions I wanted to ask and just to be myself. And it worked!

Yesterday, I had told everyone in my workshop about how discouraged I was at my progress. The lecturer told me that the stages of learning were often said to be unconscious incompetence, followed by conscious incompetence, unconscious competence then finally conscious competence.

I think I’ve made it through all the stages. I actually believe that in terms of mediation, I exist in all four states at once and at this moment.

Interests, not positions

I was learning to be a better person the other day. I’ve borrowed a great book called “Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In“. I have a sub-optimal tendency to take conflicts personally. This book is teaching me how to accept differences of opinion and better yet, how to  manipulate  negotiate with others to create solutions that are positive for all of us.

Separate people from the problem!
Focus on interests, not positions!
Generate options! This is not a zero-sum game!
Use objective criteria!

Today, in Joanium’s World…

Joan:

“I’ll print this out so we can go through the report with Peter and make notes.”

Miriam:

(who is environmentally conscious) “The report is pretty long. I know Peter doesn’t like it but can I get you to print it double-sided and two to a page?”

Joan:

(looks at Miriam carefully) “Why does he want it big? Is it because his eyesight isn’t as good as ours? He is older…”

Miriam:

“Nah. He likes to have it all on separate bits of paper in front of him so that he can rearrange the sections.”

Joan:

(exclaims) “Oh no, Miriam! You’re making me choose between you and Peter! Alas, what should I do?

Joan thinks about the problem. Clearly, there are two opposing positions here. Peter wants the report printed single-sided and at normal size. Miriam wants four pages per piece of paper. Lowly Graduate Joan is on the spot.

Who will she choose?

Will she chose her bestest work buddy Miriam, who is at this moment looking at her, wide-eyed and expectant? Or will Joan be politically canny and side with the Brilliant, Indispensable-to-the-Business Environmental Guru, Dr Peter?

Eager not to offend anyone, Joan realises she can look beyond the positions and consider the underlying interests of the parties. Obviously, Miriam wants to minimise resource consumption, an admirable environmental goal. Peter wants the flexibility; he wants to communicate his lightning fast thoughts clearly and efficiently. Unlike their positions, Peter and Miriam’s interests are not mutually exclusive!

Joan:

(slowly) “Why don’t I… load the printer’s bypass tray with scrap paper that’s already been used on one side… and then print it one to a page?”

Miriam:

(pleased) “That’s a great idea, Joan. Good job.”

 

Joan glows with pleasure.