Trees don’t cry

My heart wrenches when I see on the news footage of the South Korean contractor in Iraq begging for his life – “I don’t want to die! I don’t want to die!” Poor, poor man. A few days ago, I watched a Current Affair piece (quality journalism, of course) about families under the strain of raising autistic children. I felt so bad that we as a society weren’t supporting them.

Every day in our newspapers and on TV we hear of people fighting, dying, struggling. I’ve become quite blase about it, I suppose. I say, “Oh, that’s terrible,” and forget about it half an hour later. But when I am able to put faces and personal stories to the statistics… It’s not a nice feeling.

When I was in grade four, I remember trying to catalogue all the problems in the world in the expectation that solving the world’s problems would simply be a matter of checking things off my list. I sat down and thought really hard. “Right. So there’s poverty. The Environment. Homelessness. Drugs. Unemployment. War. Hunger. Health.” Then I was satisfied and forgot about it.

As the years went on, I added more issues to my mental list and at some point, I realised that it couldn’t all be solved and that these problems were all tangled up in each other like a mass of vines in the Amazon jungle. We could start at one corner of the tangle and try to unravel it bit by bit but I had been hoping that we could get a flamethrower and burn the whole lot away.

In all my time at school, I must have considered career options in every university faculty except medicine. I never wanted to be a doctor, didn’t even bother with the UMAT (although, if it were free I would have done it for fun). I wanted to “help people” (the way that idealistic young’uns want to “help people”… it now sounds as inane as a Miss Universe beauty pageant response) but I didn’t want to deal with human pain.

That’s why I chose to do environmental engineering. Trees don’t cry. Passions don’t run as hot when dealing with plants rather than humans, right? But as an enviro, I could still save the world. My mental justification was that making an environmental difference would last longer than helping individual people (a simplistic and wrong premise, I know).

To some extent, I was correct. I don’t know of anyone who cries over the loss of an ecosystem as they would over a loved one. But passions do run hot. There is plenty of anger and frustration in the environmental movement. But anger I can manage. Pain, I’m not so sure.

I sound like one of those teenage diaries that try to be deep and meaningful. Ugh.

One comment

  1. Anonymous says:

    Just like you, I usually just forget about what the bad news after I thought to myself, “Oh dear… that’s so sad/bad/terrible…”

    Sometimes I remembered the news for days because it has somewhat imprinted it in me. Like the news I saw on TV about this three year old girl who lost her legs and fingers on one hand. Although she was all bandaged up, she still looks so beautiful and contented. She made some cute gestures when asked to kiss her dad and mum. Sometimes she will hide behind her big teddy bear, looking so shy and vulnerable. I thought to myself, how can this be happening to this sweet little girl? What has she done wrong to have her life affected in such a way? I nearly cried. (I’m a crybaby!)

    I applaud your decision in studying environmental engineering. We desperately need people like you, to heal our already badly injured earth.

    pickle

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *